Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

Liverpool’s swank palaces versus Birkenhead Market

May 25, 2006 5:42 PM | 

IT’S vile the way cities arrange everything for the convenience of property developers – and let ordinary foot-slogging folk like me soak up all the strain, the filth and the noise of giant building projects.
Just recently I had to make an early morning trip to central Liverpool to review the newspapers for BBC Radio Merseyside.
Usually that trip entails just a short stroll from James Street station to the studios in Paradise Street.
But on the morning of Thu 25 May I found Paradise Street completely blocked off while construction on the useless huge shopping mall was cranked up a notch.

For me, in a rush to meet a broadcasting deadline, the enforced detour meant a painful hobble up Church Street and then snaking circuitously back through the lanes to BBC studios – a huge loop.
I say hobble because I’ve been half lame in my left foot and ankle for months now – and my doctor is baffled by the condition. He just shrugs while I continue to suffer.
Meanwhile, any extra walking, such as was forced on me by that gross shopping development recently, makes me terribly grumpy.
The developers are hurtling towards an ugly, consumerist face for Liverpool, which will do nothing to boost culture for European City of Culture status in 2008. Quite the reverse.
All these shopping malls will deaden social and cultural life in the city centre, not revive it.
Liverpool risks looking like any other British town – ugly, and full of the plastic frontages of chain stores.
That is the way things happen. But no-one tells you. Instead, an army of logo-launching PR twerps pump out the mantra that Liverpool is heading for a glamorous future. As if Shopping = Culture.
It beats me why the Paradise development is going ahead anyway. We have quite enough clothes shops already in town selling low-grade “designer” tat knocked up by Third World labour on near starvation wages.
Besides, why should this huge shopping complex succeed when nearby the Albert Dock is struggling, with boarded-up businesses a testament to the vanity of big, prestige projects.
Most preposterous and pretentious of all, to my mind, is the Met Quarter, between Victoria Street and Whitechapel.
It’s a naff mall that is trying way too hard to be cool. There is a repulsive poster for the Met Quarter which depicts a poseur in a cravat and a slogan that goes something like: “I want. I need. I have. The Met Quarter.”
The utterly false message is that no modern man can survive without adopting the personal vanity and shopping addictions of a teenage American girlie.
Well, I don’t give a stuff that Timberland, Armani, Hugo Boss, All Saints, Flannels and Coast are at the Met Quarter.
I don’t buy clothes with visible labels on anyway. That is a foolish thing to do, to use your body as a walking advert for international brands.
I buy my clobber from Birkenhead Market for a tenth of what these swanky city centre malls charge – and I’m noted for always looking sharp and HOT!
Anyway, as a result of my detour round the buildings works on Thursday morning, I arrived for the Radio Merseyside slot all out of puff and somewhat sweaty in the gusset.
I didn’t have enough time left to compose myself and consequently failed to pronounce the word “ostracisation” when discussing a report about poor Shahbaz on Big Brother.
Of course, the copious amounts of red wine and Southern Comfort I’d been drinking the night before might also have effected my ability to get the old gob working to maximum efficiency.
It was a birthday gathering of the New Brighton Massive from Hell’s Waiting Room, you see, on Wednesday night, for Eamonn Lairyshirt’s, er, 35th, I think.
Except for we didn’t step foot in the Waiting Room (for technical reasons). We went to the Shallow Cutting instead and stayed there until it was time to head off to the Lost Weekend late bar on the seafront.
Now I knew I had to get up at 6.30am for the radio appearance the next morning but manfully I stayed dancing (yes, all right, I know that is unwise when you have a gammy foot) and knocking back Southern Comforts until nearly 2am.
The Lost Weekend is like the bar at the end of the universe on Wednesdays. There are bizarre middle-aged couples in there, wearing country and western clobber, and some irascible old geezers (including Billy “Get Off My F******* Bus”) Bustimes.
But there are also plenty of young people, including young gays and lesbians who rock up there after the Wednesday gay night finishes at Polly Frolick’s pub.
It was a top night anyway, and I got up in time to do my BBC slot, thanks to my trusty clock-radio alarm and a phone call at 6.30am from the Bacardi Queen in Liscard.
I feel sorry for Merseyside Breakfast presenters Lee Bennion and Claire Hamilton though – having to face a grumpy beer monster like me so early in the morning.

* This blog received a marvellous compliment the other day from the postmistress at Alford near Chester, who reads it regularly.
She said it reminded her of the BBC sitcom Early Doors, set in a backstreet northern pub. I am a huge fan of Early Doors so I was well chuffed. Pip pip!

Comments (8)

Alberre wrote...

Very interesting Mr. Regan. You deserve a medal the size of a frying pan for your gallant effort in geting up this morning and telling all and sundry over the airwaves with your pearls of wisdom.
Does Eamonn Lairyshirt shop at Birko market? I myself am guilty of buying merchandise from the faceless shops you mention, and my new top (it will make an appearance in the Waiting Room this weekend) is just a billboard for some Italian geezer, but it is this rich taperestry of life which makes the world go round.
Is Mr. Craggs a **** or what? Please note this is not a swear word or a mis spelling just some goobledegook to keep the PC Brigade happy.
Cheers.
Alberre

Posted by: Alberre  | May 25, 2006 7:38 PM

Birkenhead Dave wrote...

Nice to hear a ringing endorsement of Birkenhead Market Steve, although the fashion slaves will probably have you stereotyped as a scally in a tracksuit now. But who cares what they think? When I met you in the 'Shallow Cutting' the other week, you looked like a man ready for whatever a soiree in New Brighton could throw up (no pun intended). Anyway having a queen to ensure you keep your appointments, is surely status enough!
*** Cheers, Dave. STEVE.

Posted by: Birkenhead Dave  | May 26, 2006 1:35 PM

Dave wrote...

Considering you claim to be a journalist, you don't appear to do much research. However, your comments above don't surprise me having heard some of your ill informed rants during your review of the papers on Radio Merseyside.

If you actually took the time to look in a bit more detail at the Paradise Project you will see that it is not a shopping mall, but instead will be built on the existing street pattern. And it will not just be retail, but there'll be leisure, hotels and apartments as well.

Liverpool has been slipping down the chart of shopping cities over the last few years and is way behind places like Manchester and Birmingham. In other words: it doesn't have enough quality shops. The Grosvenor development will lift it back into the Top 5, attracting many more people to the city, and creating more wealth and employment.

I would dispute that it will look like every other town. They have employed some of the world's best known architects to come up with the designs. I don't think the Moathouse and the Paradise Street car parks could be described as works of great architecture which added anything to the city previously.

Regarding the Albert Dock, the idea of the Grosvenor scheme and the Kings Arena and the new museum and the other buildings planned for the waterfront is to actually attract people from the city centre down to the waterfront. Chavasse Park and the Strand have acted as a barrier and that's one reason why the Albert Dock has struggled in recent years. It's hoped the new developments will encourage people down towards that area and give the Albert Dock a new lease of life.

Remember that culture is whatever you choose it to be. To some it is museums and fine art, to others it is shopping and eating out. With a bit of luck, Liverpool will have something for everyone.

At least take time to understand the reasons why things are happening. It may surprise you, but there is a strategy behind all of this.

*** STEVE replies: Thanks for your considered opinions, Dave. I still think the Paradise project is a pile of pants, mind!

Posted by: Dave  | May 29, 2006 3:44 PM

PopstarPaul wrote...

Well Steve I have now found a new way of keeping my finger on the throbing pulse of life in Hel'ls Waiting Room without actually having to attend and sit through some tedious renditions of what Im sure were once great songs. Looking forward to your next thrilling instalment especially after your escape into Seacombe yesterday afternoon. Didn't realise you were such a big Weller fan. Much love Paul.
STEVE replies: Oh aye, Weller is a great hero of mine, and I know YOU do some blistering versions of his songs. See you soon in the Waiting Room.

Posted by: PopstarPaul  | May 29, 2006 10:15 PM

Poncy Driver wrote...

Sir

You welcome the destruction of New Brighton's heritage and replacement with a supermarket. You object to the development of a derelict site in Liverpool and its replacement with shops selling Hug Boss. Discuss...
***STEVE replies: New Brighton is dying on its arse as a shoopiojg centre. It NEEDS a supermarket. Besides, intellectual consistency is the hallmark of a charlatan!

Posted by: Poncy Driver  | May 30, 2006 7:38 AM

Dan wrote...

I would like to strongly echo the comments made by a previous poster, Dave. Deriding the Grosvenor scheme as a "useless huge shopping mall" is grossly misleading and regretably simplistic. Whilst, generally speaking, I would also be against a "useless huge shopping mall", the regeneration of the Paradise Street area is qualitatively and quantatively NOT such a scheme. The plan uses an effective range of relatively high-quality buildings (certainly given the architectural merits of Liverpool building in the last two decades), weaves different usages into an existing steet pattern, fills a desolate space between Liverpool's principal commercial and tourist-orientated areas and, at long last, demonstrates that the private sector has some serious faith in Liverpool's future as a commercial centre.

I have no idea whether the author has any detailed knowledge of the city or its urban fabric, but the basic premise of the piece - that the Grosvenor scheme was objectionable because it prevented this unfortunate example of the "ordinary foot-slogging folk" walking to Radio Merseyside by the shortest route - says it all as regards the depth of thought which has gone into this analysis.

If everybody had taken that view that anything associated with "Big Business" and commerce was automatically negative, then Steve would have been walking not through a vast and internationally-important Victorian seaport, but an inconsequential village on the banks of the unused Mersey.

Could Steve possibly elaborate as to why he thinks the project is "a pile of pants" and provide a considered analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of a massive injection of capital into the regeneration of a particularly neglected corner of a great city.
*** DAN, thanks for that, a most persuasive argument. The thing is, though, I just don't like all the consumerism and materialism in modern society. STEVE.

Posted by: Dan  | April 13, 2007 5:06 PM

Dan wrote...

Steve,

Thanks for the reply.

On a wider level, your fundamental objection to the materialism of modern society is certainly a valid critique.

Apologies if my original post was a little fervent! I would not dispute the fact that consumerism is not the panacea by which society's ills will be tackled.

I suppose at heart I have enormous an fondness for the city of Liverpool and wanted to underline how important its physical and economic renaissance is, and how significant a factor Grosvenor's investment is.

*** Fair points, Dan. I share your fondness for Liverpool. SR.

Posted by: Dan  | April 16, 2007 12:57 PM

Dannny wrote...

Why don't you go back to Wigan where you bang on about so much and leave Liverpool to be. What is going on in this city is amazing and believe you me, if you were to never visit the city again nobody would notice. Do us all a favour and go back to Wigan to spout your dreary depressing opinions and leave Liverpool to the scousers who really believe in their city. NEVER COME TO LIVERPOOL AGAIN. You'll still wake up in the morning. You sad man!

Posted by: Dannny  | April 22, 2007 2:10 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)