Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

The RIGHT way to respect the dead (cops, please note)

September 24, 2006 6:56 PM | 

NO matter how coarse, brutal and stupid British society becomes ... our belief in showing respect for the dead remains strong.
And I’m glad about that because it is a sign of hope for the chaotic present and our uncertain future.
We are right to expect others to show respect for a dead person, even if those ‘others’ didn’t know the dead person very well.
We know in our bones that it is right to make some gesture of sympathy or solidarity when a member of our community dies.
But to show respect for the dead ought to be a voluntary, instinctive act.
If you attempt to bully people into showing respect – as has happened in Norris Green and Croxteth, Liverpool, in recent days – then you invalidate the gesture totally.

This is the mistake made by friends of the murdered teenage gang member Liam Smith.
Teen gang members have been pressurising local shops and pubs to shut for the day on Monday 25 September when Liam’s funeral will take place. A sign of respect is being demanded, you see.
The police see this as intimidation of traders and are urging them to defy the bullies and stay open.
Chief Insp Mike Cloherty, area commander for the gun crime-blighted Norris Green, is reported as saying: “His (Liam’s) funeral must not impact on the lives of ordinary people. From my perspective in charge of that area it’s business as usual on Monday.”
‘Business as usual’ when someone’s funeral is being held? That surely is not the right thing to say. I think it insensitive.
Nor do I particularly think it a good idea for a senior police officer to state that a funeral should not impact on the lives of ordinary people.
Funerals always impact on the lives of ordinary people. That is in the nature of public lamentation.
Now, I know that 19-year-old Liam Smith was a gang leader, so he did not lead a blameless life. But which of us does manage to lead an entirely blameless life?
The point is that Liam's death is being marked in the traditional way with a funeral service at a church. I expect the impact will certainly be felt away from the confines of the church, as is quite normal.
It is the proper business of the police to try to stop intimidation, of course, but I hope on this occasion they will exercise some tact and, indeed, respect in doing so.
People are grieving, their emotions are raw, and so they are not behaving entirely rationally. You have to make allowances for that.
The fuss about this young man’s funeral, and the issue of what constitutes respect for the dead, set me thinking about when I was a young lad, growing up on a tough, working class housing estate in the early 1960s.
Even as a boy, I was always impressed when suddenly, from time to time, all the houses in our street would draw their curtains in broad daylight and keep them closed for a week or so.
What had happened was that a neighbour had died. The word went around pretty quickly and everyone drew their blinds ‘as a mark of respect’ and they kept them closed until after the funeral.
It was something you did automatically back them, as well as offering other forms of help and comfort to those who grieved, even if you had previously had fallings-out with the family of the dead person.
All that was forgotten as a community came together.
When there was a death around our way when I was a kid it brought out the best in everyone, because all felt it was their duty to express solidarity with those who were suffering loss.
I somehow doubt that sort of thing happens on quite the same scale now.
But whatever else has happened to our society over the past 45 years or so I do hope things have not become so bad that we need to take advice from the cops on whether or not we should show respect for the dead.
We all know, deep down, that all human life has meaning and value. Family and friends will instinctively want to do their best for this young man who had, admittedly, gone off the rails.
So I hope the funeral goes well, though I don’t personally know anyone involved.
Unashamedly, let me say may God bless Liam Smith’s soul. I hope his family and friends find peace and comfort in the difficult months and years ahead.
I also hope God will help the police clear up the ugly gun crime that disfigures Norris Green rather more effectively in the future than they have managed in the past.
After all, when vicious criminality exists on the scale it does in parts of Liverpool then that tells me there's been a massive failure of policing.

Comments (4)

Sam Alabaster wrote...

Crickey, Steve, lighten up.
*** Regan replies: Come on Sam, you know I don't do 'fluffy'.

Posted by: Sam Alabaster  | September 25, 2006 10:51 AM

Pink elephant wrote...

It still happens sometimes. When my gran died (although it was 7 years ago) we had the traditional funeral with the undertaker leading the cars at a slow walk from the road where the procession started from. It was in Maltby, Yorkshire, and wasn't where my granny lived and nobody there, bar family knew her. But, in spite of this, the houses on that street shut their curtains as we went past. Plus, most of the young people I know respect the dead, if no one else.
Perhaps the police should have suggested the shops close in protest at gun crime if they didn't want to close for Liam as without it he would still be alive
*** Well said, Pinky.SR.

Posted by: Pink elephant  | September 25, 2006 1:49 PM

Alberre wrote...

This comment is for Piercing a Baby's Ear. Unable to post to that comment box.
It was insensitive of Jonathan Ross (he’s a t#@t anyway) to link stupidity of parents to their council estate background. Stupid perhaps not, as it is stereotypically true. Just look at the Vicky Pollard types and the knuckle- dragging lowlifes wondering round these council estates. It is wrong however to blame council estates. No council estate has done any wrong. It is the social deprivation of society and the councils for filling these areas with druggies and other undesirables that gives council estates there bad name.

Go back to the not so distant past, and it was people from council estates that provided the backbone of the country. It was the people from the council estates that won two world wars, then helped to rebuild this country and today are dying in Iraq. Cannot hear Jonathan f*@#ing Woss shouting his mouth off now can you. Also the higher one's social standing in life, does not guarantee intelligence. As I know some posh people who are as thick as pig s***t . Oh look there goes my working class council estate big gob again.
You and I are both from a council estate, and I’m proud of the fact. It has done me no harm what so ever, it has made me what I am today.
We are just a couple of “WORKING CLASS HEROES”
New Brighton Massive (Middle East Branch)
*** Food for thought there - SR.

Posted by: Alberre  | October 3, 2006 11:54 AM

Anon wrote...

None of us lead an entirely blameless life but neither do we terrorise, carry guns, injure people, intimidate, or deal drugs. I also don't think there are many of us who would hold a gun to a baby's head whilst being held by its father as a way of threatening someone. I suggest you get off your cross as somone will need the wood. Also the police did not encourage shops to stay open, they actively encouraged them to close. Shop keepers were told to close by the police as they could protect them somewhat on the day of the funeral but they could not protect them from fire bombs afterwards! I suggest you get your facts and your principles correct and in some sort of order. The streets are nothing like they were in the 1960's so stop living in this era, it's well and truly over.
This is all true and hearsay which is why I have chosen to remain anonymous.

Posted by: Anon  | October 17, 2006 4:26 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)