Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

Nasty health nazis and the bifter ban

October 24, 2006 12:27 PM | 

THE anti-smoking health fascists are getting more and more excited that the day is soon coming when smoking will be banned in all workplaces – crucially including pubs, clubs and restaurants.
The spineless cretins who sit in Parliament voted the measure through earlier this year. It is due to come into effect in summer 2007.
It’s an outrage that such proscriptive action could be approved by legislators who dropped hook, line and sinker for the dubious medical evidence that smoking is bad for our health. Overall, I’m convinced it is not.

Let me explain. Consider this health factoid, which the anti-smoking zealots would rather you didn’t think about…smoking is a great reliever of stress.
And stress is a killer. Therefore, smoking saves thousands of lives each year.
Also, you know the British. If they are not allowed to smoke they will eat even more pies, cakes and chocolate bars, and they really are a danger to health and wellbeing.
We are already a nation of lard-arses, prone to high blood pressure and strokes.
This is on my mind because I’ve just come back from a weekend in Scotland where the stupid, vindictive ban on smoking has been in force since last New Year’s Day.
Scotland, of course, now has a little Mickey Mouse parliament all of its own, which hasn’t really got enough real work to, and so was so was first out of the traps to bring in the ban.
The logic behind the ban, as told by the daleks who support it, is: “Smoking has been banned in pubs in New York and in Ireland so – ‘nah nah, na nah nah!’ - we should do so here too.� Pathetic.
Has anyone paused to consider that such a ban is every bit as daft and illogical as it is sinister?
Once they’ve criminalised smoking in pubs, what will they try to outlaw next? Having a pint of beer? Well, it would be a logical extension.
Laughing? Telling mucky jokes? Chatting up someone you fancy? Eating crisps (obviously a serious health and safety issue!), darts (ditto)? All those things are as traditional in pubs as smoking.
Next I expect the lemon-sucking puritans of the health and culture industries will try to ban people wearing track suits in Liverpool pubs as part of the preposterous poshing-up process underway for 2008.
Blimey, that’ll be 90 per cent of Scousers barred at a stroke.
We are discovering that the hand of the nanny state – so long hidden within a synthetic velvet glove – is actually made of iron, all the better for smashing into people’s pleasures and customs.
So now we are left wondering what it will be like when the bifter ban comes into force in England next summer.
I can hardly imagine my local, Hell’s Waiting Room in New Brighton, as a smoke-free environment.
It’s like a tar factory in there. Almost all the punters smoke. Around my table last night, myself, Daddy Hardman, Della and Quiet John were all puffing merrily away.
Apparently, the landlord Mr Craggs is having some sort of covered shack built on a section of flat roof, so we’ll all have to huddle up there when the ban comes in.
First, let me say I am amazed that the smoking ban is so rigorously observed by the public. What has happened to the famed rebellious streak in the Irish and the Scots? They meekly submitted to the ban, so I assume that will happen in England too.
Actually, I can tell you what will happen here in England when ciggies are banned in pubs next summer. First, sales of crisps go up when nicotine-starved punters get the munchies. That’s hardly beneficial to health.
Another side effect is that the pubs start to stink of human sweat and urine. Previously, the tobacco smoke masked those odours.
When you ban things there are always unforeseen, unwanted results. For instance, Irish and Scottish smokers now go outside the pub and group together in the doorway in the wind and rain for their ‘fag breaks’. Wait for it …
These Celtic types love to gab, so quick as you like they are chatting each other up on the pub’s front steps. Huddling together for warmth. Next thing, they are snogging away like billy-ho.
So I’m betting there’s been a rise in the number of home-wrecking sexual affairs resulting from Ireland and Scotland’s smoking ban. How healthy is that?


Comments (7)

Ricky from Baynards wrote...

Doncha just luv New Labour! Two years ago they effectively decriminalised cannabis. If you wander through parts of London now you can smell weed being smoked everywhere. If you were to go up to a copper and complain about this they would point out that 'no offence was being committed' - yet there's legion cases of people having cannabis smoke blown into their faces by truculent teenagers who know they won't even get a slap on the wrist. Somehow I don't expect the police are going to be anywhere near as tolerant towards cigarette smokers who are caught red-handed when the ban comes in. Of course not, the poor old fag smokers will just be some nice 'easy nickings' to boost the 'crime' figures and make self-righteous Chief Constables feel good about themselves. I'll bet that the anti-smoking obsessive head of North Wales Police can't hardly wait for the new legislation to come in.
I wonder what will happen when police turn up at a pub to arrest a cigarette smoker and find that there are a number of dope smokers in there. What's the odds that it will be the old bloke tabbing on the B&H King Size who gets chucked in the cells for the night while the dope heads get left alone (apart from an apology for any inconvience that they might have experienced). I'd happily put a tenner on it myself!
* Well said the Rickster! - SR.

Posted by: Ricky from Baynards  | October 24, 2006 2:35 PM

Annette Kalms wrote...

Steve, I don't smoke, but I don't believe in the smoking ban. It is upto people what they do, if they choose to smoke so be it. My family all smoked. I never moved out of the house. I basically said 'so be it'.
***REGAN replies: Quite right. It's a libertarian issue.

Posted by: Annette Kalms  | October 25, 2006 3:22 AM

Pink Elephant wrote...

Ooooo, Stevie, you're always at your best when on a real rant. I suppose my view on this is the same as on the hunting ban. I love fluffy animals, but some people like to hunt them. It's fine to ban the cruel practice of letting the dogs rip the fox to pieces when it can be shot, but a complete ban is just pants and, I believe, the thin end of the wedge when it comes to caving in to a tiny section of society when the rest are not in favour. Similarly, by all means make sure pubs have non-smoking areas so non-smokers can enjoy a night out, but an all-out ban is ridiculous. I don't smoke and have weak lungs because of a previous illness, but I don't expect complete strangers to change their lives for me, I wouldn't for them.
*** REGAN replies: A most reasonable response from Pinky.

Posted by: Pink Elephant  | October 25, 2006 5:18 PM

Ian Moor wrote...

I have a mixed opinion of this really! But I hope most will understand my point of view. First let me say I am a non-smoker, and I appreciate all the comments, and your own view Steve, I agree that it is yet another restriction by an over-protective government that seems to be continually driving towards a nanny state. However as a professional singer, I am effectively forced to work in smoky environments, which is not good for my voice! In a lot of venues now there are highly efficient extractors that reduce a lot of the smoke, but in smaller, older buildings this is not always the case, and most people would think that I was a heavy smoker myself, based on the smell of my clothes after a gig!

Everybody has the choice as to whether they go to smoky places, be it a pub, club or other social venue. Most workplaces now are totally smoke free. When I worked (in my regular day job) in Hull, the only place employees could smoke was outside the boundary of the site. “Pink Elephant� wrote above about having non-smokers' rooms in pubs. Unfortunately for myself, I do not have the option to sing in a non-smokers' room. I must perform wherever I am asked to perform. OK, it could be argued that it was my choice to be a singer, and I confess I was, and still am fully aware that the majority of my gigs will be in clubs where many people smoked.

I can truly appreciate both sides of the argument, as a singer frankly I welcome the ban as this will no doubt help my singing in many cases, as I have mentioned above. Now this may seem a little selfish to some, but is it really selfish to want to perform the best that I can? I know from past experience that smoky rooms do affect my voice, I struggle more towards the end of a gig. I hope Steve that you and your other readers can appreciate this.

I am not the one who called for an all out-ban, and I never signed a petition for it. I welcome it purely from my point of view as a professional entertainer. However, if I was not an entertainer, or indeed if I had been a little luckier, and was now able to perform in larger venues (theatres, arenas, stadiums etc..!) it is likely that I would not encounter smoky environments as much, and as such I would not have as strong an opinion. I see it as many people do, another smack across the face of freedom. I honestly have no problem with people smoking, and I sympathise with you all.
***REGAN replies> Thanks to Ian for that. I must say it is not something I had hitherto considered. Ian, regular readers might like to know, is a fine singer. A few years back he was voted Stars In Their Eyes Champion.

Posted by: Ian Moor  | October 26, 2006 3:16 AM

Jack & Jules wrote...

Hi steve,
just a point regarding the non smoking whingers.
Have you ever noticed how many of the anti-smoking brigade offer to bring back ciggies, for us the tabacco fiends, from their holidays in order to supplement their holiday expenses.
Two-faced or what?!
*** You know what... I find the kindest, funniest and the warm-hearted people are smokers! SR.

Posted by: Jack & Jules  | October 28, 2006 4:25 PM

Sally wrote...

As well as banning smoking we are now being told that the authorities want to stop smokers from being able to have operations on the NHS. I think that we pay enough taxes (Income and buying over-priced ciggy tax) to cover all our health needs as smokers. I've smoked for 24 years and never needed an operation yet. (Don't care to work out how much I've spent on ciggies in that time - too scary). Yet smackheads who largely do not pay tax because they do not have jobs get everything, methadone, needle exchanges, etc. Why is this considered ok by the Govt?
*** REGAN replies: Errr, because Government ministers and NHS bosses are politically correct creeps? Thanks for your comments, Sally.

Posted by: Sally  | November 3, 2006 4:37 PM

Anal Finger wrote...

Honesty, integrity and a persuasive mentality are the most important qualities of an elected official

Posted by: Anal Finger  | April 26, 2007 11:34 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)