Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

Bring back the en-suite vomitarium

March 20, 2007 12:30 PM | 

IT’S amazing how puritanical about booze British people can be - given that an estimated 60 per cent of the population (including me) regularly over-indulge in alcohol.
At the risk of offending those with a delicate disposition, let me confess that last Monday night (or early Tuesday morning, rather) when I came home after spending seven hours guzzling red wine, Guinness and Southern Comfort at my local pub, I promptly threw up all over my bedroom floor.
In truth, I have only just finished scrubbing and disinfecting the carpet as I write this.
Bingeing on booze and then vomiting isn’t smart and it isn’t clever - but I am not really ashamed of myself since it doesn't happen to me very often.

Besides, I was trying to cheer myself up as I've been down in the dumps recently and had taken a few days annual leave from work in a bid to get over myself.
Nor do I feel the need to apologize to anyone for vomming on the bedroom floor, since I live alone and no-one was upset by my actions, apart from myself.
I've often felt that the Romans had a much healthier attitude to over indulgence than we do. Any Roman family worth its salt in first century Britain would have an en-suite vomitarium in their villa.
The reason I mention booze in this column is that I really cannot understand why people made such a huge fuss about Andrew Flintoff getting sloshed and acting the fool in a pedalo in St Lucia following England’s Word Cup defeat to New Zealand.
OK, him hitting the bottle was less than ideal behaviour when there was a match the following day against Canada.
But then Flintoff isn’t a robot, He’s not one of those sportsmen who is dedicated to winning at all costs and takes sport way too seriously.
Too many athletes and sports people are like that. They become boringly obsessed, so demented by the desire to win that many of them slide into taking performance-enhancing drugs, which is much, much sadder than getting pissed occasionally.
But, as I say, Flintoff isn’t one of the new generation of sporting automata. He is a real man, aged 29, who likes to drink, a lot, like millions of other men and women in our country.
He is also a father, so we shouldn’t be surprised that he drinks. That is one of the reasons God invented alcohol – so that the strain of raising children could be made tolerable (just).
For Flintoff’s transgression at the beachside bar and in the pedalo out at sea at 4am, he was stripped of his vice-captaincy, fined £1,000, banished from the ground and dropped from the side that laboured to a victory against Canada.
England’s head coach Duncan Fletcher also publicly exposed Flintoff as a regular caner (as if we couldn’t have guessed that, after seeing him on TV celebrating England’s Ashes victory in London in 2005).
During that particular booze-a-thon the star was asked had he had any lunch and amusingly replied: “Yes, a cigar.�
But the press are especially hypocritical about sportsmen who like a drink or ten. Apart from doctors, I can’t think of any occupational group that abuses alcohol more than journalists.
“He’ll NEVER be skipper again,� screamed one redtop headline about Flintoff's most recent "shame". Frankly, I doubt that.
Disappointingly, Flintoff issued a grovelling apology, as seems to be demanded of anyone caught “letting the side down� these days.
I don’t know if he wrote the apology himself, but it has the tone of something scribbled down by a nervous PR fluff-head with an over-tight sphincter.
Flintoff said: “It was unnecessary high jinks and I have to accept the consequences… I know I shouldn’t have done what I did and I have to accept the punishment. Everyone has my assurance that I will be doing everything I possibly can to make up for this lapse.�
Oh, please. No-one died.
The only words of commonsense to come out of this farce came from Ian Botham who said he was amused by Flintoff’s antics and that there had been a “total over-reaction�. “The big mistake was getting caught,� added Botham. Quite right.

* APOLOGIES to regular readers that I've not been updating this column regularly in recent times. As I've hinted already, my head's been up my ***se (as folk are prone to say in New Brighton) for a week or so. Anyway, normal service has now been resumed.

* THANKS to Tim, who emailed from heaven knows where, and who stumbled on my blog when he Googled the singer Dorothy Squires.
I'd mentioned that I played some of her tracks at the party I held at my New Brighton flat back in January, you see. Tim wants to know which tracks by Miss Squires I played at that party. From memory, Tim, they were "I'll Be Walking Behind You (On Your Wedding Day) and "I Still Believe" - the pair of which would make fantastic opening and closing soundtracks for a feature film about obsessive love.

* TOMORROW - read my blog about male broodiness.

Comments (3)

Alberre wrote...

It was not the booze that made you sick, just one of those Wigan pies.
Now cheer up and go and get p***ed again.
*** How dare you impugn the honour of a Wigan pie, Alberre. STEVE.

Posted by: Alberre  | March 20, 2007 1:12 PM

Annette Kalms wrote...

I agree with your comments Steve, the best of it is nearly all the older cricketers like Botham did have some wild times. If you ever watched Question of Sport some of the odd take photographs proved it. At the end of the day he is a human being and not a plaster cast saint.
*** Quite right, Annette (hic!) See you in Hell's Waiting Room Later. STEVE.

Posted by: Annette Kalms  | March 20, 2007 4:40 PM

Darren wrote...

All we are saying is give booze a chance...

As a hardened drinker myself who as a freelance writer uses this opportunity to spend the summer months at his local getting slowly sloshed, we seem to be a nation divided by drink. On one hand, many of the chattering middle classes are happy to recline in front of the TV or with a book and polish off bottles of plonk night after night whilst decrying the seeming feral younger generations who go out, get drunk and use our city centres to rut, fight, piss and puke. It's all binge drinking but in a different bottle.
Personally, we all need to grow up and be men about this. In the good old days of pubs, a time when women were consigned to the saloon bar (if they were lucky) and the public bar was the domain of the men, to get absolutely paralitic would be seen as a cardinal sin. If you can't hold your drink, you should be holding the pint, etc. And we need to get back to that ethos.
Drink to be merry, drink to be sociable, drink to while away the summer afternoons, but don't drink to fight or give yourself carte blanch to act like a prize idiot. Forget Asbos for hoodies, we need Asbos for folk who can't handle their booze.
Remember booze is for big boys and girls, no?
As for being sick when drunk, I had an incident last September when me and the Missus managed to snaffle too many bottles of expensive red during a home-cooked spagbol frenzy. There's nothing worse than waking from a booze-induced coma to find yourself covered in red vom. For a while, I thought I'd haemorrhaged and died. Of course, real men clean up their own puke...that's the real mark of a man.
*** Dazza, you and I are a dying breed. STEVE.

Posted by: Darren  | March 21, 2007 2:07 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)