Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

The morons who have ruined British telly

May 4, 2007 4:29 PM | 

JUST look at what passes for entertainment on the telly these days …
* Poncey cookery shows
* Dismal how-to-do-up property abroad strands
* Rubbish about young people ‘marooned’ on a desert island
* Elimination shows based on so-called singers auditioning for parts in worthless, derivative, musical theatre
* Hollyoaks – so bland they had to set it in Chester

* Pop Idol-style karaoke kack
* Clip shows of animals falling off window ledges and fat-bottomed women wrecking garden furniture by sitting on it
* ‘Celebrities’ having to train dogs, or eat bugs in the jungle or skate while wearing ridiculous tangerine leotards (yawn, yawn, yawn)
* Bill Oddie in anything
* Graham Norton, ditto
* Alan Bloody Titchmarsh, ditto
* Wildlife pornography shows
* Shows about storms and extreme weather
I do wish television executives would get real about their medium. It is essentially only suitable for drama and entertainment, and not for art or serious journalism or cultural commentary.
The trouble is the modern generation of TV bosses can’t even get entertainment and drama right.
Why, for instance, don’t commissioning editors hire the wealth of comic and musical talent that exists in our country to perform in prime time?
Why don’t we get to see the actors, the comedians, the dancers, the genuine, mature singers, and the magicians and novelty acts on mainstream TV?
Well, the uncomfortable fact is that TV bosses are invariably London-centric, left wing / liberal, middle class plonkers who hate their own country and its vulgar traditions of entertainment.
They have been trying to bury home grown entertainment for years, preferring instead to commission endless copycat ‘people’ shows or buy in duff American series full of (for Brit viewers) irrelevant US cultural references.
I ask you: has anyone found anything even slightly entertaining about Ugly Betty on C4?
In terms of drama, I will admit that British TV still has a few rather good serials, though there has been a dumbing down and stretching of quality in soap operas.
That point was made recently by the screenwriter Paul Abbott, who was a writer on Coronation Street and Cracker and has since created Shameless for C4.
He reckons writers have to fight like billy-ho to get gritty drama such as Shameless commissioned in Britain at all, and he contends that our leading TV writers don’t talk to each other because they are too busy doing derivative soaps and dross dramas about cops, doctors and lawyers.
He feels that Coronation Street “can be fantastic� still. But it is “overstretched, like all the soaps�, he says.
Coronation Street, in my view, is the only soap still worth watching. The current storylines about bitterness within the with the Connor family, and about the Barlows splitting up, have been very well written.
And I do like the knowing, wink-wink sauciness of Liz McDonald’s affair.
As for The Bill, the episode show on Wednesday 2 May, was stonkingly good.
Having the detective Mickey Webb thump and draw blood from his nasty, ginger-haired boss, Ch Supt Heaton, was highly entertaining.
As usual, the soapier elements of The Bill on Wednesday were interlaced with a procedural crime story of great quality and emotional impact.
Then there was the cracking tale Emma’s discovery of the true enraged, abusive personality of her horrid husband Matt. Superb – and, frankly, much better that Paul Abbott’s Shameless has ever been.
It's strange, though, that the two best shows on TV at the moment are both very long-running. Where is all the exciting new TV drama that a culture as riotous, funny, arsey, irreverent and humorous as Britain's really ought to be producing?

*** TALKING of entertainment, I had a very good night out at Pacific Road, Birkenhead, the other week when I saw Karl Lornie and a bunch of other musicians playing soul music.
I might have reached the grand old age of 50, but I was up from my seat and shaking my tail feathers on the dance floor along with all the young (and not so young) female fans who like to throw their drawers at Karl.
I went to the gig with Popstar Paul, who has started an open mike at the Shallow Cutting in New Brighton, and Commuting Mitch and his missus Greta, who, frankly, just like an excuse to cram a load of booze down their screeches.
I must say, however, it seems sick and wrong that you’re not allowed to smoke in a venue such as Pacific Road.
When laid out as a cabaret lounge, as it was for the Lornie soul gig, it is the sort of place where the smoke from bifters adds greatly to the atmosphere.
Still, because the Health Nazis and our Liberal-Fascist MPs have got their way, we won’t be able to smoke in any public, enclosed space from July 7.
Modern life is rubbish.

Comments (6)

Dom wrote...

Welcome back Sam Brady. You have been missed.
REGAN REPLIES *** Hey Dom, cheers. Actually do you know that I really was SAM BRADY on the old ORACLE service? And for several years on the old Teletext service that took over from it. But those b*******s at Teletext sacked me because I wasn't mealy-mouthed enough for their poxy service. STEVE / SAM

Posted by: Dom  | May 5, 2007 4:41 PM

Sam Alabaster wrote...

So Steve, you were Sam Brady, eh? That explains a lot. Sam was one bad ass of a TV critic, though obviously mentally deranged.

Posted by: Sam Alabaster  | May 6, 2007 5:23 PM

Annette Kalms wrote...

Steve, while I agree with much of what you say about television programmes. Have you watched New Tricks on BB1 on Monday night. It is so good. I do wish they would bring back entertainment shows, not amateur nights like X Factor

**** Hmmm. I'll check that out. It's got that actresswith the gorgeous eyes, hasn't it? I forgoet here name. STEVE.

Posted by: Annette Kalms  | May 8, 2007 3:14 AM

ricky wrote...

What about all those 100 best/100 worst shows Steve? What do you think of them?
*** Oh, err, I think they were rather good, especailly the ones featuring little old moi! as a pundit.

Posted by: ricky  | May 8, 2007 4:35 PM

sophia wrote...

;)Sloppy, raggedy-assed old life. I love it. I never want to die.

Posted by: sophia  | July 7, 2007 12:19 PM

New Brighton Newbie wrote...

Sam Brady? I used to read your column on Oracle! And to think that the people selling us the house said there aren't any celebrities in the area!

Couldn't agree more about the state of British TV. It seems to me that the advent of multi-channel TV has brought with it a dilution of the audience and therefore less money to fill each slot, plus it's created an environment where programme makers have to grab the audience's attention in the opening minutes, using sensation, familiar concepts and tried-and-tested formulas before the viewer flips to another channel.

Something that illustrated the difference in modern drama to me was when I bought a 1981 series called "Fox" on DVD. I knew nothing about it but it was made by Euston Films who made the likes of Minder, Sweeeney etc and I'd head good things about it so I bought it on impulse.

The first episode left me cold, but having spent £40 I persevered. The 2nd episode didn't do much for me either, but the 3rd episode blew me away and I was hooked for the remainder of the series!

If it was being made now, the climax of the 3rd episode would have been brought forward to the start of the 1st. Whilst it would have still been dramatic and grabbed my attention, I wouldn't have cared about the characters in the same way that I did after the long protracted character development phase, and ultimately it would have been less satisfying.

Of course when it was originally broadcast at 9pm on a Monday night in 1981, it was only competing with the News on BBC1 and possibly something highbrow or minority interest on BBC 2, so the majority would stick with it, and be rewarded for doing so.

Also, some of the best remembered successful series such as Fawlty Towers, Black Adder, Fools and Horses, Minder etc were complete flops when first broadcast. Indeed in the case of the latter 2, they didn't become hits until the 3rd series.

But in those days it seemed that the artists had a say in things, whereas today it's all in the hands of the bean-counters.

Since they believed in what they were doing, they persevered. First series of 'Fools' was a bit dry, but by the 3rd it had really matured and gained momentum. Minder confused people when first shown because the comedy drama format was relatively new, and people saw Dennis Waterman and car chases and thought it was The Sweeney, then couldn't understand why they were talking about water damaged umbrellas. Yet even at a cost of £100K per episode (a lot in the late 70s) they kept it going and sure enough the 3rd series was a huge hit and gained a Bafta (prompting a hasty repeat of the first two series).

Today if something isn't pulling in a decent audience during the 1st series then there's no way it will get a 2nd, so programmes don't get a chance to develop either in themselves or in the minds of the viewers.

Then there's the fact that when you had the likes of the BBC, Thames, ATV and so on making a huge number of the programmes we watched, most of them would be fairly safe bets (new series of old favourites etc) but they still had some room to experiement with new, sometimes daring ideas, which sometimes worked, sometimes didn't, but with independant production companies they can't afford to deviate too far from tried and tested formulas and do something different, because if they have a spectacular flop then they will find it harder to get future programs commissioned.

And nowadays if something proves to be popular then they milk it to death! Millionaire for example is admittedly a well thought out format, and once a week fair enough, but when they started showing it every night, Chris Tarrant's limited repetorie of facial expressions starts wearing a bit thin.

I've watched Coronation St since the 70s and in some ways I'd say it's improved, but they do have far too many sensational storylines and over use characters.

Take Sarah Plat for example - knocked up at 14, meets a middle aged bloke posing as a teenager through a chat room, mother marries a serial killer who tries to drown her, bad boy boyfriend nearly kills her joy riding, gets engaged only to find out her boyfriend is gay, then tries to marry his brother only for him to leg it out the window. And yet she keeps smiling as if none of it ever happened! Resiliant folk in Manchester!

As Brookside found to its cost, too much sensation may make short-term audience gains, but it ruins any kind of long-term credibility.

And of course although the IBA was much maligned, they did seem to succeed in keeping standards at a reasonable level. Now "Most bums on seats for the lowest outlay" seems to be the mantra of the TV industry!

The demise of British TV was all too predictable! I remember an American friend coming over during the 80s and he was gobsmacked by how many decent programs we had on our 4 channels compared to the rubbish they had on their dozens of channels.

The broadcasting bill has a lot to answer for!

STEVE REPLIES: Thanks Newbie.Very perceptive, and very probably the longest comment ever left on my blog!

Posted by: New Brighton Newbie  | August 5, 2007 10:53 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)