Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

Smoke Ban's plastic police – meet your spiritual leader!

July 2, 2007 1:25 PM | 

adolf.bmp

I MAKE absolutely no apologies for comparing the current anti-smoking lobby in the UK to the fascist authorities that did such harm to Europe 60 years ago.
Because, you see, the controversy about the ban on smoking in enclosed public and work spaces in England is not really about health at all.
It is about something that is ultimately much more important to humanity – namely personal freedom.
It is a cruel irony indeed that the new repression is being pursued by people from the liberal persuasion in modern politics.
Ironic but not entirely unexpected …

For nearly 150 years ago Pope Pius IX, in outlining the Syllabus of Errors, pointed out where Statism and Liberalsm would lead humanity – into a very dark cul-de-sac indeed.
The Syllabus showed how Liberalism, born out of a desire for freedom, would first conflate the concepts of freedom and licence and then transmute itself into a nasty, proscriptive monster which wants to stamp its joyless orthodoxy all across the world.
That is what is happening now.
And that, in part, is why it comes no surprise to me that the Liberal Democrat-controlled city council in Liverpool has been among the most active public authorities in the nasty persecution of smokers which has been underway in recent years.
Nor am I surprised that this financially inept and lunatic council will be mounting the largest clampdown in the country to ensure that no-one breaks the monstrous new smoking ban.
The Liberal Democrats (who are neither liberal nor democratic in the true, original senses of the words), have together with the equally nasty Primary Care Trust in the city (representing doctors and local health centres) recruited 200 busybodies to go stomping around restaurants, shops and bars to hunt down anyone daring to flout the bifter ban.
What a repulsive waste of public money. And again, it is quite typical of emerging totalitarian societies to give the under-employed silly little uniforms and then set them to “work” in non-jobs to irritate the hell out of the general public.
Why don’t these smoking ban enforcement officers get a job that allows them to sleep at night – such as closing down orphanages?
Such is the sickening culture of cronyism and political correctness in Liverpool, however, that I wouldn’t be surprised if the taxpayer-funded Culture Company was right now busy designing a logo for these so called “smokefree ambassadors” to wear on their jackboots.
Something very sinister is afoot in the Western nations. Governments are starting to use environmental dangers and health scares and terrorism to trample all over our freedoms.
They won’t stop at banning smoking in pubs. Now that they have got away with that, it will be the other things that traditionally happen in bars they will try to ban next...
Soon they will try to stop us: drinking beer in pubs (that has already started with warnings on labels); playing darts (now the health and safety Nazis’ top priority); telling dirty jokes; and heaping scorn on the Government.
All those things have been going on in pubs for centuries – as had smoking, until the dawn of the new fascism on July 1 2007.
And with Merseyside Police at the forefront of outrageous new moves to spy on the Great British Public, it won’t be long before Big Brother’s boot is stamping on all our heads, again and again and again. It stinks.
Remember, you heard it here first.
I am grateful to regular readers Jack and Jools for pointing out that Nazi Germany had the world’s strongest anti-smoking movement in the1930s and early 1940s, supported by the fascists’ tame purveyors of perverted science.
Many Nazi leaders were vocal opponents of smoking. Hitler(pictured above), Mussolini, and Franco were all non-smokers, whereas those lion-hearted champions of human freedom Churchill and Roosevelt were all fond of tobacco.
One of Hitler’s stated goals was the achievement of a “secure and sanitary utopia”. That is precisely what Britain’s modern health fascists are trying to achieve too.
Disgustingly, Hitler also saw his anti-smoking campaign as one instance of the Nazi campaign for “racial and bodily purity”.
The trouble with people such as Hitler and the current smoking ban zealots is that they do not comprehend one of the most profound lessons from history – namely that (a) you cannot, and should not try to, achieve a human society that is free of risk and (b) if through repression and prohibition you come close to eliminating risk, then the resulting society would not be fit for humans.
It would be a society that couldn’t, in truth, be called human at all.

Comments (10)

Lord Vino du Matin wrote...


I am getting angrier and angrier. I am also concerned about the danger to the environment posed by millions of discarded ashtrays. Have the health/eco Nazis thought about that? Well, HAVE THEY?

Posted by: Lord Vino du Matin  | July 2, 2007 5:27 PM

Annette Kalms wrote...

The main comment should be "those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it again"

Posted by: Annette Kalms  | July 2, 2007 9:57 PM

Darren wrote...

Let's be honest, the only reason you are whinging is because you are one of those smokers who likes to bunk off work for a quick drag instead of doing a full day's work, you skiver. How many man hours are lost to those nicotine-stained wastrels who slink off to waste time having a fag? Very convenient...
REGAN REPLIES:Well I nevercalimed to have a Protestant work ethic.I have a Catholic work ethic,which is quite a different story.

Posted by: Darren  | July 2, 2007 10:38 PM

Lord Vino du Matin wrote...

I have a plan. I am going to go outside a bar for a cigarette. I will finish it but hold the last hit of smoke. I will go back into the bar and exhale. Will I be arrested? I wonder.....
*** REGAN REPLIES: I think youshould be arrested ... but not for anything to do with smoking.

Posted by: Lord Vino du Matin  | July 3, 2007 10:40 AM

Lord Vino du Matin wrote...

Oi! You are supposed to be on my side.....

Posted by: Lord Vino du Matin  | July 3, 2007 5:53 PM

robbie burns wrote...

Steve, great site! I knew you'd end up as a great writer one day (I had to edit the stuff you wrote for Oracle, poor sod that I was) - if you're ever in London the drink's on me.
(well one anyway)
(as long as it's under £1.99)

REGAN REPLIES: Howdy stranger! Thanks for your kind words. I'll look ye up in London and claim that drink. Don't go to London much these day, mind, just oocasionally.
For the readers' benefit, Robbie is the man who had to edit my Sam Brady column for Oracle Teletetext - a tough gig as I was billed as "the man they can't gag" in those days..

Posted by: robbie burns  | July 3, 2007 9:21 PM

Big Scott wrote...

Hey Steve. I gotta tell u that this ban has been in place up here in Scotland for over a year and nobody bats an eyelid any more. As you well know a pint and a fag was a real staple of daily life up here, but the torchlit demos just didn't materialise. It was strange at first to see groups of smokers clustered outside pubs getting their fix, but a lot of folk reckon that pubs - now entirely smoke-free - are much more attractive places to go. Also I gotta say, (RE the previous column) that smoking is a bona-fide, medically proven cause of heart disease, so hardly a stress reliever...
Oh and Alan wants to know why you've got a picture of Blakey from On the Buses at the top of your blog?
REGAN REPLIES: Hmmm ... I found the MacSmoking Ban quite a bind when I was last in Scotland, er, nearly a year ago, and so did The Dark Booth, I seem to recall. Must come up there for a visit soon. I regard Scotchland as my home from home. Blakey? Well, I think me new byline pic accentuates my natural resemblence to Johnny Depp!

Posted by: Big Scott  | July 4, 2007 10:15 AM

Annette Kalms wrote...

Hi Steve, read Darren's comment re time wasted through people going for a fag. Daddy Hardman as you know is a heavy smoker when out, but in his job never could smoke in work. He noticed the people that smoke would pop outside for 2 mins, while the people who didn't smoke would disappear for 15 mins. My comment being who time- wastes the most?
REGAN REPLIES: Yeah, there are loads of lemon-sucking, miserable, non-smoking lead-swingers in the public services.

Posted by: Annette Kalms  | July 4, 2007 2:33 PM

Brian wrote...

People who smoke don't have a choice whether they smoke or not.
They're addicted.
In that sense they don't have the personal freedom that you talk about anyway.
Indeed I'd argue that smokers are the fascists in all this. Forcing their needs and wishes on others.
Also haven't you forgotten about those companies that deal in tobacco? They just profit from addiction - an addiction that tears families and loved ones apart from each other in the end.
Are you really in favour of that?
I'm supportive of the ban because it will mean that by the time my children even think about smoking (in about ten years time) with a bit of luck it will be seen as even more of a pariah activity than it is now.
Down with addiction. And down with the profiteers of drugs.
Don't peddle the myth that the ban is an attack on personal freedom. It isn't. It's enhancing freedom by helping to kill off smoking and liberating those who are addicted.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Yours
A fascist ex-smoker :)
REGAN REPLIES: Hmmm. I stand by what I said. particulalry we need a choice of bars - thaose that cater for smokers, those that don't. I know which type of bar I'd rather be in.

Posted by: Brian  | July 4, 2007 5:04 PM

prince57 wrote...

cigarette smokers face a greatly increased risk of heart and respiratory disease, of cancer of the lungs, mouth, throat, stomach, pancreas, bladder, cervix and RECTUM. (in your case, Steve, your mouth). Only joking! Anyway i smoke and really enjoy doing so. i give up for 5 years in the early 90s and started again late 90s. in the no smoking 5 years i didnt feel any healthier taste food any better or feel richer. health tip: smokers have an increased need for vitamin C. the most likely explanation is that it is used by the body when it is neutralising free radicals in tobacco smoke and those released during its detoxification.
Anyway, as trevor mcdonald's mate bernard manning once said "100% of non smokers die". the way i would sort this silly law out is have pubs where only smokers could go to or work at. And people caught inside them not smoking or having cigs on them will be fined 20 cigs per punter in pub at time.reduced to 10 cigs per punter if paid in 7 days. signing off now, its last orders in my living room i call it the Castle and Trumpet after record breaker Roy RIP.Who helped me to sort this problem of cig and pint in harmony. no offence roy if its proven than passive smoking kills you'll be my hero. bless all.p57.
REGAN REPLIES: Thanks, Prince. Interesting points, but yoy don't like wasting time with initial capital letters, sdo you. I've put a few in your comment, but not many. I do to much sub-editing in my day job to be arsed doing a thorough job on these comments.

Posted by: prince57  | July 7, 2007 1:03 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)