Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

Stuff your interactive nonsense. I just don't want to play

October 5, 2007 6:22 PM | 

THE police, the NHS, our country’s bloated infotainment industries (digital TV etc) – they are all so terribly keen to get interactive with us these days.
Well, I don’t want to play. They’re not cool enough to be in my gang.
And they can shove their hi-tech services where the sun doesn’t shine.
What everyone fails to realise is this: just because the technology exists to do something does not necessarily mean that that “something” is a good idea.
Television, films, the world wide web and computer games are all slowly converging into one all-dancing, all-singing stream of noisy moving images which are liberally laced with coarse sexuality (and in the internet’s case, really disgusting pornography).
Although there is some good content on the internet (you’re looking at it, dude!), the web’s overall influence is not benign.

It is bad, because the vast majority of internet content is poorly edited (if edited at all) and therefore it foments dangerous and untrue ideas among the people who use the services (some of whom are very thick, having been raised on dumb-ass shoot-‘em-up computer games).
Overall, the internet (and other digital entertainment platforms) are dumbing everything down – the spoken and written language, culture and even human identity itself.
Also, as I mentioned a few paragraphs back, much of the internet’s content is pornographic and geared to loveless, dehumanised sex. That’s very bad indeed.
Similarly, much of the increased digital TV that is linked to the web is pornographically-led in one way or another.
I don’t know where this digital interactivity will end, but I can take a wild guess.
The next big thing will be that local councils want to run their own TV networks, via the internet at first.
Can you imagine how awful Wirral (or Liverpool) Council Television would be?
It would be dull of earnest advice about: going green (yawn, yawn); how to claim benefits; how not to behave anti-socially; how to get your unwanted sofa carted away; and how, if you are a motorist, you will be hassled and hassled and hassled again over parking.
My prediction is not as far-fetched as it sounds. One local authority down south, Kent County Council, that has launched its own TV station – operated by 10 Alps, a company set up by the Live Aid big gob, Bob Geldof.
Now, having got all that off my chest, let me say I have been watching some of the new digital TV networks of late, and one of them actually has a series that I like the look of.
I refer to The Riches, a US drama, starring Brits Eddie Izzard and Minnie Driver, which is on Virgin 1, Mondays.
They play a couple of trailer trash grifters, Wayne and Dahlia Malloy, who have fallen out with their fellow travellers.
So they go on the run with their three kids and are involved in a road accident in which a wealthy couple, the Riches, are killed.
The Malloys then steal the wallets, credit cards and identity of the Riches, and push their bodies and their flash car into a swamp.
Our roughneck anti-heroes then proceed to live high on the hog, by passing themselves off as the Riches, even moving into their luxury gated mansion.
Wayne and Daliah are complex characters and, though they are morally dubious, the viewer warms to them. It’s a series that’s worth checking out.
And I say that as someone who was never a fan of Eddie Izzard’s stand-up routines.
He came across as a smug, middle class, smart arse – and there are far too many people like that on TV.
I wasn’t impressed by his dressing up as a girlie either – not a good look for a big lump of a fella like Izzard.
More recently his voice has been annoying the hell out of me in those useless Government propaganda cartoons about how we should all go green.
“Recycle,” he would squeak, “the possibilities are endless!”
Oh, just p*ss off will you!

Comments (9)

Mensahman wrote...

Merseyside Police are so "interactive" fighting crime that they have pulled the Blogging Policeman here on the Wirral Blogs.
I sent info to the police to the police about various things and they have done Sweet FA about the matters I raised.
The Merseyside Police are basically paying lip-service to justice to fool the public.
The new hi-tech gimmick seems to have worn off now, and they have gone back to being tax-collectors via speeding fines.
REGAN REPLIES: Thanks for that Mensahman.

Posted by: Mensahman  | October 5, 2007 7:46 PM

kate wrote...

Hi Steve

Fellow leekonian here 'Love the attitude' in your blog.

Posted by: kate  | October 7, 2007 7:00 PM

Smokehouse wrote...

Hi Steve, nice to see you are back to your old ascerbic self! Yes you are right about TV. There are so many channels with nothing worth watching. I think Bruce Springsteen may have beaten you to the punch line though with his song "57 channels (and nothing's on)". Keep the web interesting and long may you continue with your observations.

REGAN REPLIES: Thanks, Smokehouse. I know you are a blogger. So maybe I shou;ld link to your site and you to minbe. Will do that. It's just that I am too tired / rushed / drunk / technically incompetent to do that just now.

Posted by: Smokehouse  | October 9, 2007 12:22 PM

Lord Vino du Matin wrote...

Do you have any handy links for the "really disgusting pornography" please?
REGAN REPLIED: I think you are quite sexed up enough already.

Posted by: Lord Vino du Matin  | October 9, 2007 2:21 PM

Darren wrote...

It's not the Internet that's causing the great dumb down, nor is it computer games (have you actually played any, Mr R? I think not, I think you is a cantankerous 50-something who spies youth and the wind of change with suspicion and fear, like most old folk with a tartan blanket draped across their legs). No, the dumbing down is caused by multi-channel TV services and the dear old meedja. In the old, old, old days, there were three TV channels (well there were when I was a lad) and in those old days you would find arts programmes rubbing shoulders with religious shows, variety, comedy, music and whatever because each channel had a remit to serve the public. So if you sat down and watched one TV channel, there was a good chance you'd catch some drama, some comedy, a documentary and possibly a current affairs show like World in Action. Nowadays, any form of editorial control is out of the window because the public is expected to seek out their own programming. If you like the Arts, you'd better buy a satellite dish and sign up to Sky. If you want to see music, don't bother with terrestrial. So you don't have any breadth of programming, just cultural digital ghettos where the cogniscenti might lurk. The terrestrial channels need bums on seats and so the diet of derivative programming reigns supreme. Though sometimes a good drama series like Kingdom or Murphy's Law might buck the trend and prove that not all viewers want to see The World's Greatest Elvis or Simon Cowell doing his bitchy shtick. Factor in the media's current obsession with z-list slebrities and you can see why we are producing a generation of deluded wannabe children determined to get a career in the media or to "be a star" via the X Factor. Zzzzz...

The thing is that the Internet has enabled an awful lot of people to have a voice and has put a lot of so-called professional writers into redundancy. Like traditional media, there's a lot of good stuff out there and a lot of crap stuff, you just need to know where to look and to develop a taste for it. A bit like looking for arts programming on terrestrial TV.

REGAN REPLIED: Perceptive commentary from old teletetext hack / techie, Darren. Did he used to be that SAM BRADY. Oh, no. That was me!

Posted by: Darren  | October 9, 2007 3:49 PM

Holly Black wrote...

Steve,
Please excuse my writing in your comment box, it’s the only way I know how to write to you……

I don’t doubt you are aware of the articles in the local press that say that Peel will be lodging plans for a Mersey Barrage by 2010 .…
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2007/10/09/power-from-the-mersey-in-2020-64375-19917827/

A Mersey Barrage is, of course, a highly controversial and complicated thing with many different proposals, sites, and lots of considerations – engineering, economics, politics, power generation, storm surge control, estuary ecology (salinity), secondary uses of the structure and – hugely important – maritime traffic policies and management.

What Peel and their experts probably don’t know however is that – a barrage site of New Brighton across to Langton Dock would be hugely popular with Merseysiders if it incorporated lots of leisure/pleasure/tourism aspects.

That popularity is something people from outside the region may very well miss and Peel will need all the popularity it can get when the Nimbys, wild life people, Stanlow and the Manchester Ship Canal all start raising objections and conditions.

And yes, it is possible to build there and allow supersize ships (and tall ships) to sail through without stopping – but only on the tide. You can view it as upmarket of a new New Brighton pier.

I suspect it needs local journalists for Peel and the politicos to get the message and encourage you to publish on the topic.

I do think that New Brighton (end of Victoria Road) to (the North End of) the Langton Dock River Wall would be the very best location for a number of reasons.

REGAN REPLIED: Very interesting, Holly. Thanks. I will be returning to this subject, and saying what I think of all the selfish, wealthy minority of people in New Brighton who are trying to sabotage the resort's future by objecting to all plans for development of our spectacular estuary locatoin.

Posted by: Holly Black  | October 10, 2007 10:24 PM

Brian wrote...

I take your point re: the internet being poorly edited, but it has opened up the world to just about anyone who can use a computer.

It's also created a huge amount of business growth and brought about transparancy.

Transparancy in terms of price (for books, TVs and just about everything else) and perhaps more importantly - political transparancy.

Just look what happened in Burma recently.

I wonder if the recent turmoil there would have been worse without those brave souls who 'broadcast' their stuff out on the internet?

REGAN REPLIED: Thanks for you comment, Brian.

Posted by: Brian  | October 12, 2007 4:15 PM

New Brighton Newbie wrote...

Hi Steve,

The people with a vested interest in this digital revolution sell us it on the basis that choice is good, but when it comes to entertainment, I'm a great believer that abundance simply dilutes enjoyment and appreciation.

I'm not just being nostalgic, a few years ago instead of subscribing to sky movies I started going to the Sunday double-bill at my local arthouse cinema - and I'd actually look forward to it all week sometimes. It's not just that most of the films were great (it is run as a charitable trust, so they are more interested in quality than bums on seats and they filter out most of the generic Hollyturd that other cinemas show) - most of them were probably shown on Sky, but I just find it impossible to get exicted about watching Sky movies when it's there 24hrs a day, repeating the same old stuff over and over to big fanfare (admittedly convenient though when you've got kids and don't have a nearby cinema).

Likewise, Top of the Pops even in it's hey day was never great, with all the miming and generally crap DJs, but being one of the few music programmes on TV in those days, it was essential viewing and I got a lot more out of that than the dozens of 24hr music channels spewing out a narrow genre of the same dozen songs over and over intersperced with these 10 minute £3 a month ringtone adverts!

And remember Coronation Street when there was a big cliff hanger on Wednesday and you had to wait until the following Monday to see what happened next! It was so much more satisfying that the current "go and watch Eastenders and we'll be right back with a damp squib" setup.

When it comes to the Internet, it's the same problem as the traditional media - who do you believe? The traditional media will twist and present the facts to fit their reader demographic, but generally they know their limits, wheras on the internet people's biases come right to the fore.

Other than that, I had some friends up at the weekend - we had a brilliant night out in New Brighton! I thought I'd check out hell's waiting room, but they were a bit freaked by it, I'm sure I'll pop back though. We loved Talulah's and found a couple of other cracking pubs. What a fantastic place!

REGAN REPLIED: How good to hear from you, Newbie. Come to the Bards on 5th of November and I´ll buy you a pint.

Posted by: New Brighton Newbie  | October 16, 2007 4:24 PM

New Brighton Newbie wrote...

Nice one, see you then! I'm going to try and make the Shakespeare event at The Magnet too.
REGAN REPLIED: Grrreat. C thee there.

Posted by: New Brighton Newbie  | October 18, 2007 2:03 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)