Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

Between the purity of the angels and the savagery of beasts … is politics

May 4, 2008 11:19 PM | 

WELL, I did my democratic duty. I went along and voted in the local government elections last Thursday.
Most people, of course, didn’t bother, which is a shame … and quite dangerous, given how adrift and disconnected English society is right now.
Politics might not be fun, it might not be very attractive (it has been dubbed "showbiz for ugly people" after all), but it is dead important. Why?

Well, because if you don’t have politics, you have the law of the jungle instead; ultimately you get ferocious beasts running wild, acting on instincts alone.
But man is more than a beast. He is different from the rest of the animals. He has a moral conscience.
He is a political animal. He has the capability to act with others for common purpose, to bring security and dignity to life – and he has the intelligence to know that.
But man remains, by and large, a selfish animal too. He is not an angel, not always in the mood to do good to others – or for others.
The angels don’t need politics. They automatically act nobly and selflessly. They don’t need any State to tell them how to live.
The beasts don’t need politics. They do not and cannot take notice of any civil power. They are too stupid for that, frankly.
But between the purity of the angels and the savagery of the beasts there is humankind.
And we humans do need, and benefit from, regulatory force. We need politics, because without it, without sovereign power invested in the State, we would rip each other apart; we would be at war with each other – perpetually.
The trick is to get the State to act responsibly and not to trample on our freedoms; to let us, if you like, be a bit selfish.
Now, given that we Brits, for the moment, live under a reasonably benign political system known as representative liberal democracy does not mean that we should become blasé about our freedoms.
Make no mistake, our freedoms are under attack as never before – from an over-large State that includes: local councils; social landlords (housing associations that are far too fond of telling us how to live our lives); the health service and social services; and the police (who’ve discovered a disgusting totalitarian passion for spying on citizens and filming their every move using CCTV).
And that’s all before I even get to mention our horrible Labour Government, its outrageous smoking ban, and the despicable European Union.
But we need to keep voting while we still have a chance. It would be too easy to join in with the collective shrug of contempt for politicians and politics.
It would be too easy to be apathetic about what is happening to our country and other nations of the West. We used to be regarded as the best possible sort of societies – better than the tyrannies that existed elsewhere in the world.
But our values are now being eroded from within by the emergence of a proscriptive and nasty Liberal Fascism that is trying to make us conform to new internationalist orthodoxies and a militant secularism.
The Western nations are suffering from a frightening loss of confidence in themselves and their history – a trend picked up by brave writers such as Michel Houllebecq.
OK, we don’t quite know what the future holds, but frankly, I don’t have a good feeling about it.
We will always need politics, however, locally, nationally and internationally.
(Locally, the politics haven't been good for decades, especially in Liverpool. Turbulent times have bred turbulent times – from Sir Trevor Jones’s era of fake Liberal radicalism, through to the grotesque rule of Militant and Derek Hatton, right up to the puerile bitchfest that has been, and just about continues to be, the Liberal Democrat years.)
But don't let the contempory scene or the naff recent past put you off politics.
We must all get back into the habit of voting and taking an interest in what the politicians are up to.
We need to choose what kind of politics we want.
Because if we let others choose for us, the chances are we won’t enjoy the future at all.

CALLING ALL POETS AND WRITERS! The group I set up, called the Bards of New Brighton, will celebrate its first birthday on Monday 5 May, when we meet at the Little Brighton Inn, Rowson Street, New Brighton, starting at 8.30pm.
Thanks to the landlady Shirley for her continued hospitality.
The Bards are a friendly and entertaining lot. Their readings provide a refreshing antidote to the nastiness and emptiness of much of popular culture.
If you read this in time, please come along and join us.

Comments (5)

Malpoet wrote...

I too voted on Thursday (I have never failed to vote in my whole life and I agree with Steve about the importance of using this right to choose our governments), but the truth is that I found it alomost impossible to choose between the useless options available to me.

I actually agree with most of what Steve has to say on the subject although we would differ on detail. The creeping sovietisation of our society in which the state has grown ever larger and our freedoms are continually shrunk is resulting in the infantilisation of everybody.

The more we submit to nanny telling us exactly what is good for us, how we must behave and what all 'right thinking' people believe, the more we surrender our individuality; our very identity as individual human beings with choices and values.

In Russia and China, Stalin and Mao murdered tens of millions of people and put hundreds of millions into 're-education' to impose their ideology and to enforce compliance with the demands of the state. Disagreement with the communist party meant classification as being mentally ill. This tyranny finally fell apart in Russia and it will not survive for very much longer in China since they have recognised that a command economy results only in starvation and have embraced the free market. In this country the process has been more insidious and it will be much more difficult to reverse the enslavement by apathy that has occurred.

The state in Britain now controls about 43% of the economy. In the business world it is accepted that control of more than one third of a market is a monopoly and the company is forcefully broken up by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission. So the state is the monopoly contoller of our complete economy. That was the Stalinist dream which murderous dictatorship was not enough for them to maintain. The useless and parasitic bureaucracy of Wirral Borough Council employs about one in twelve of the workforce in Wirral and that does not include other state employees!

Instead of dealing with crime, the police are dealing with the half witted social engineering projects of politicians intent on moulding us all into compliant zombies. They demand more and more police although we have more of them than we have had in our history. We don't need more police, we need fewer and simpler laws which are thoroughly enforced.

The essentials of a free society are free markets, private property and the rule of law. That has been known for 3,500 years. Every time that governments have moved away from that they have impoverished or murdered their citizens. As Steve so rightly points out, without government we have murder, mayhem and terror. With excessive government we have coercion, oppression, hardship and misery.

We must defend our right to choose in everything that doesn't damage the freedom of others. We must exercise our right to choose our governments. The choice we need to make now is for government that is reduced to a minimal size, that repeals laws rather than making new ones, that reduces spending and taxes year on year. A government that protects the rights of the private citizen rather than stealing them. A government that serves rather than masters its citizens.

Time for a Libertarian Party.

REGAN REPLIES: Very eloquently put, as usual, by the Malpoet. And you should heare his brillant poems - he's a regular at the Bards of New Brighton poetry night (tonight Mon 5 May, and every first Monday of the month, from 8.30pm at the Little Brighton inn, New Brighton) . Malpoet also runs a poetry and discussion, Birkenhead, on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Keep it real folks. For love, peace - and LIBERTY!

Posted by: Malpoet  | May 5, 2008 10:03 AM

Ann Hobro wrote...

Hi
Its ann Hobro i voted for Conservative
Personally i think right now our government is a very socialist state where the people who do work have money took from their taxes and have to pay for people who don't work, which is very bad.
Also, at this rate i think the political regime of the labour party will start to border on communism.
We might as well go outside and praise Karl Marx.
I agree with Malpoet on the fact that the
government makes all our desiscions for us. There should be big changes if this country wants to get anywhere.
REGAN REPLIES: Trouble is, Ann, I think David Cameron's Conservatives are just as committed to dreary statism as Labour.Well done for voting though!

Posted by: Ann Hobro  | May 6, 2008 7:49 PM

Smokehouse wrote...

Hi Steve, I didnt vote. I feel ashamed that I did not because millions of people have fought for that very right and many millions more wish they had that right. However, I would argue that there did not appear to be anyone on the ballot sheet that I deemed worthy of voting for.
Somehow the values of each politician seems to have blended in with all of the others including members of the opposition. It reminds me of George Orwell and the pigs in Animal Farm. At the end it was almost impossible to tell the farmers and the pigs apart.

The street cameras don't bother me, I have nothing to hide and I dont mind proving to the police who I am if they should ask me. In fact there is a whole raft of state policies that do not bother me. I think its is quite reasonable for the state to know who is doing what, when, where and why. This really won't come from a more Libetarian government as Malpoet suggests. I am not rubbishing his dreams, they are wonderfull but I cant think of any where in the world with a large scale population where they would. (feel free to quote one and prove me wrong, I will move there!)

What I would suggest is a much stronger government and no I am not suggesting we resurrect dictators or bring back the likes of Pol Pot or Stalin. But I cannot think of a single state where the values of Liberalism have not been abused and crime rates shot up. I really do want to vote but for who? Certainly not for the pigs who want to push their snouts even further into the trough and not for some one who wants to open our borders to all and sundry.

REGAN REPLIES: Tell it like it is, son.

Posted by: Smokehouse  | May 6, 2008 8:55 PM

New Brighton Newbie wrote...

Hi Steve,

Sorry I didn't make it to the bards this week, my tonsilitis has made a comeback, with hay fever thrown in for good measure!

I think voting is a noble tradition - rich in symbolism, but as a means to change anything - completely useless given the limited choice on offer. Indeed the danger is that people vote and feel that's their democratic duty done for another 4 years, without doing their bit to make the country a better place in the meantime. Even a government who are competent and genuninely care about the wellbeing of their people, can only do so much if the people don't do their bit.

Some say it should be made illegal not to vote, but I'd go the other way and say in ideal world there would be a test to make sure people knew what they were voting for, not just voting out of habit or clever ad campaign. After all, if you stick a page 3 girl on the Euro, Sun readers will vote for it - regardless of what economic impact (good or bad) it would have on our economy. People who dedicate their lives studying economics can't agree on what effect it would have, so why ask (stereotypical) Sun readers who don't have a clue?

Surely the problem isn't the government telling us what to do, it's the fact that we do what they tell us, without registering any kind of meaningful protest?

Can you imagine if they'd tried to impose a smoking ban in the workplace in 1979? Our industry would have ground to a halt. Of course that kind of extreme militancy arguably is a contributing factor to the fact we've no industry left to bring to a halt, but all the same there must be a happy medium between the two.

It just seems since the miners strike we've been conditioned to think that there's nothing we can do to help change things we don't like.

Personally I think one of the biggest problems is our national media who act as a filter between the public and the government, controlling the information that flows beween them. They abuse the "feedom of the press" they are given for their proprietors political needs and commercial ends.

A worthwhile media would be unbiased and highlight issues, with a "call to action" of what we can do about it.

Instead we get a fait-a-complis "this is bad / what'd do you expect, it's Britain / there's nothing you can do about it / deal with it".

They give us a victim complex, dubbing us "Rip-off Britain" citing that for example DVDs are cheaper in the USA and French Wine cheaper in France, but omit to mention that French Wine is more expensive in the USA, and DVDs (even French Films) are often more expensive in France.

With a daily dose of formulaic sensationalism (often over nothing) it's no wonder that as a nation we have such low morale, low self esteem and few people are motivated enough to vote.

Until the "man in the street" realises that there is a difference between being informed and reading a national newspaper (indeed you might as well read "The Beano" for a balanced view of what's going on in the world) and takes an interest in what's really going on and finds ways to change it, nothing will significantly change for the better unless by sheer luck a decent government comes along.

REGAN REPLIED: Thanks for that, Newbie. Hope you are feeling better soon. I sympathise, particulalry about the hay fever which I've also been suffering from. See you soon.

Posted by: New Brighton Newbie  | May 8, 2008 11:43 AM

the smoking kid wrote...

Yo, I got to vote for the first time and it was tense. I got a real rush. Wow. Oh yeah.

Decided to vote Green Party, gotta save this fragile environment.

Better still we got some free cream eggs down at the centre. Yum.

REGAN REPLIES: Oh, never mind the environment, let's hear it for chocolate confectionery! never eat Cream Eggs meself - but I am addicted to Mars Planets.

Posted by: the smoking kid  | May 9, 2008 12:13 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)