Grab my RSS feed   (What's this?)

Profile

Steve Regan is a writer who lives in New Brighton. He’s a performance poet and a rebel. He drinks in a pub he calls Hell’s Waiting Room and a late bar known as The Lost Weekend. Steve has an unusual take on modern life – as you’ll discover …

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

RSS Feeds

Rss Grab my feed

(What's this ?)

  • Add to:
  • icongoogle.gif
  • iconyahoo.gif
  • iconbloglines.gif
  • iconaol.gif

Sponsored links

Latest Posts

It really is time to cry FREEDOM!

June 18, 2008 7:14 PM | 

DAVID Davis MP’s decision to resign his seat and stand again on a freedom ticket has confused political commentators in the national press and the BBC.
That's because they don’t really “get� displays of principles in politics.
Politics is just a game to most of ‘em.
But many intelligent ordinary men and women up and down the country have no difficulty at all in appreciating the Tory politician’s decision to make a stand in defence of freedom.
One man told me that the hairs stood up on the back of his neck when Davis made his speech about forcing a by-election.
Davis spoke of “the insidious, surreptitious and relentless erosion of fundamental British freedoms�. He’s quite right, of course.

I must say, however, that Davis’ opposition to allowing potentially innocent terror suspects to be locked away for up to 42 days without charge is actually the weakest plank of his freedom campaign – considering the very high risk of deadly Islamist terror attacks in our country.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the 42 days argument, there are however plenty of other infringements of freedom to get worked up about.
Davis himself listed some of them…
- the planned introduction of the most intrusive identity card system anywhere in the world.
- a CCTV camera for every 14 citizens (it’s what George Orwell warned about in his prophetic novel 1984)
- a DNA database (for the UK) bigger than any dictatorship has
- an assault on jury trials – that bulwark against bad law and its arbitrary use by the State
- the creation of a database State, opening up our private lives to the prying eyes of official snoopers and exposing our personal data to careless civil servants and criminal hackers
- so-called “hate laws� that stifle legitimate debate, while those who incite violence get off Scot free.
I rather like David Davis. Some six years ago, when I worked as a columnist on the evening paper in Hull, I featured him in my Out To Lunch With Steve Regan column, as a celebrity guest I took out on expenses.
The man’s background is well known. Born to a single mum and brought up in a humble Yorkshire prefab, he dragged himself up by his bootstraps and made a successful career for himself in both business and politics.
He is something of an action man and has served in the Territorial version of the SAS.
That's impressive, but more importantly, he is a warm and engaging human being – not cold and snooty like a lot of the top Tories are.
And like all decent men and women, he values freedom greatly.
I wish there were more politicians like him.
Generally nowadays there is such little understanding of what freedom means – and so little value placed on it by our political leaders.
But ..but… the good news is that people are starting to wake up to the assault on freedom that's underway by a nasty, snooping, proscriptive British State that's in thrall to a vile Liberal Fascism.
David Davis mentioned some of the ways freedom is slipping away. Here are some others…
- the smoking ban in pubs and workplaces – it’s cruel and hateful and forces old people into social isolation
- the persecution of motorists by target-chasing idiot cops while serious crime is ignored
- councils, health authorities and housing associations having the cheek to lecture people on how to live, eat and behave.
Of course, the whole of history tells us that you can’t have freedom without laws and we need the State (nations) to codify those laws.
Now, all that might seem obvious, but I would ask everyone to think about it, really think about it. Think about freedom today. It’s worth giving some thought to.
We don’t need to get too philosophical about it – even though freedom is a core subject of philosophy.
But it is worth quoting what the philosopher John Locke said: “Where there is no law, there can be no freedom.�
He was right. We need the State (as the only legitimate authority) to curtail your freedom somewhat, because the State also curtails the freedom of others – which is the only thing that can make your freedom real!
Without freedom under the law, we would have only violence and fear.
But one Very Big Problem occurs when the State becomes over-weaning and tries to regulate every aspect of its citizens’ lives. That’s happening now. To you and me and David Davis.
Another problem is when the State, shamefully, in secret, and with deliberate deceit, tries to give away the freedoms of its citizens to another power.
That's also happening now – with the attempted abandonment of British sovereignty to the unwanted and largely undemocratic European Union.
The Irish – they are not big but they are clever! – have said no to the Lisbon EU Constitution (I refuse to call it a treaty, because it ain’t). Good for them.
But already the creepy political elite of the EU, including our Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Foreign Secretary David Milliband, are trying to push forward with the unwanted Lisbon measures by ignoring the Irish (or suggesting they vote again and this time reach the “right� decision), while refusing to give the British people any say in a referendum.
That’s because they know, if asked, a whopping big majority of British people – decent, patriotic, freedom-loving people – would say “No. Not now. Not ever. Bog off.�

Comments (4)

Smokehouse wrote...

HI Steve, I personally think that the stand David Davies is taking is no more than a token which will achieve nothing. To the best of my knowledge none of the other parties are even supplying an opposition candidate. I actually agree with the 42 day law. I agree with the cameras dotted around the UK. I don't agree with the database or ID cards although I have no alternative solution and something needs to be done.
I seem to recall one MP as saying we do not need more laws in this country, we need the exsiting ones to be enforced, something which the police seem reuctlant to do. Maybe it is something to do with budgets and targets. Crimes involving damage to property where the cost is less than 500 quid are not even investigated.
I totally agree about our freedom being eroded with the refusal of this government to hold a referendum on the Lisbon "Treaty". Maybe we should pull out of Europe forever. After all when we joined EFTA we had no idea that we would one day be ruled from Brussels. Now that really is Big Brother.

REGAN REPLIED: Yes, the European project is the biggst threat to freedom, and there certainly is a problem with law enforcement in this country. At least there is a debate about the threat to liberty now - we are no longer sleepwalking into tyranny.

Posted by: Smokehouse  | June 19, 2008 10:19 AM

Ieuan wrote...

Steve,
In respect to the 42 day issue, my view is that enough exists within the current legal machinery to apprehend suspects for this amount of time AND BEYOND if reasonable evidence or belief is in place. The intelligence services, even if they had been asked for an opinion, would often say that their operations are often complex and delicate and bringing evidence to somebody detained could blow covers and compromise their work, HOWEVER, if a judge (or set of) were specifically picked to scrutinise evidence and pass JUDGEMENT on continual detention then this could work. The legislation is clunky and cuts across far too many liberties and principles in my opinion and has been brought in for the wrong reasons. It is the thin end of the wedge.

In terms of surveilliance etc. I have no issues with this as long as the law is sufficiently in line to protect individuals from insidious or unjustified screening - it isn't - data protection needs updating to keep up with society and the use of these cameras!

In terms of David Davies, I can't work out whether he's Don Quixote or Cyrano De Bergerac! I know you've met, and he seems a good egg and anyone who's broken their nose 5 times (1 was in a fight on clapham common) can't be all that bad, but I wonder about his motivation for doing this. His ego has always been brought into question and I wonder whether this is his method of getting his own way because David Cameron wouldn't be emphatic in rolling back 42 days.

The by election will become a media circus and I'm convinced his message will be swallowed up in the cult of personality which will only set the cause back.

Finally, Europe - this unseemly back peddling seems feels like the work of those grabbing, ambitious Europhiles determined to stir the corpse of a united and federal Europe. It's just a shame that the [elected] representatives member states don't stand up and be counted and I think Milliband has got a cheek even commenting on this when HIS goverment withheld a referendum for the UK public.

REGAN REPLIED: Plenty of food for the brain there, from Ieuan. Ieuan, you shouold write a blog.

Posted by: Ieuan  | June 20, 2008 2:00 PM

New Brighton Newbie wrote...

Hi Steve,

Yeah the 42 day law, it's unlikely to have any direct effect on my life. The odds of me being mistaken for a terrorist are pretty remote, as are the odds of being killed by a terrorist who had been arrested and released despite wanting to hold him longer.

It is of course hugely symbolic, but that's not what bothers me most.

What bothers me most about it is that major changes in society are usually gradual. e.g. in the 70s a vocal part of society got up in arms about swearing in shows like The Sweeney. But over the years as the boundaries have been pushed slowly but surely, we are now in a position where Channel 5 can put out soft porn and nobody blinks an eye (in case they miss any of the action!)

Likewise, once we accept that it's ok to keep a suspected terrorist locked up for 42 days without charge, and it's an easy thing to accept - none of us have any sympathy with terrorists, it's not a big jump to extend it to suspected murderers and rapists. If we're going to lock them up without charge, what about muggers, burgulars, people who commission reality tv shows ...

Before you know it, they'll be locking people up for writing several paragraphs on someones blog where they could have just said "thin end of the wedge!". And the general public won't see anything wrong with it because their thinking will have been conditioned into it over a period of time.

Whatever his motivations, I have to applaud Dave Davis - in this day and age you need a bit of pyrotechnics to get the attention of the media and some publicity. It's true that the message will be trivialised by a media more interested in entertaining than informing (as people are more likely to pay for media that entertains rather than informs) but at least the message will get out, and perhaps some who haven't given the issue much thought will stop and think.

Personally I don't believe the legislation itself is anything to do with terrorism. After all, attacks have thankfully not been regular occurences as we all feared at the time.

The cynical side of me thinks it's more to do with the fact that although the public have bought into the idea that our economy can survive on simply selling imported goods to each other on behalf of overseas owned retailers, topped up by selling off our remaining assets and borrowing heavily, the goverment are aware that compounded by natural resources running out and the cost of imports spiraling that this isn't sustainable in the long term, and are trying to get legislation in place to deal with civil unrest if things do go really pear-shaped when the "BROWN" stuff hits the fan.

I really do hope I'm just paranoid (or perhaps a tad eccentric!)

REGAN REPLIED: You're certainly informed - and entertaining!

Posted by: New Brighton Newbie  | June 22, 2008 5:46 PM

Kev wrote...

Steve. Just a quick reply to this with a couple of references you may have already come across.

One of the most though-provoking things I've seen on the web has to be ZeitGeist http://zeitgeistmovie.com/
Whether it's conspiracy theory gone mad or not, there are plenty of issues it addresses which tie into our concept of freedom and who is planning what for the greater good.

On a less sensationalist level was the BBC documentary "The Trap: What Happened to Our Dream of Freedom" I can't sum it up much better than Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trap_(television_documentary_series)

REGAN REPLIED: Thanks Kev, I'll have to look at those links in detail later when I have time off from my selfish, self-aggrandising everyday stuff. I did have a look at The Trap material on Wikipedia, however. It's good that the BBC will still commission and carry such stuff when everything else seems so dumbed down.

Posted by: Kev  | June 25, 2008 3:14 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)